I2P Dev Meeting - July 14, 2015

20:01:40 <hottuna> 0) Hi 20:01:40 <hottuna> 1) I2PCon: Status update 20:01:40 <hottuna> 2) I2PCon: Liqueur license ($25) 20:01:40 <hottuna> 3) I2PCon: Allow photos without explicit consent? 20:01:40 <hottuna> 4) I2PCon: Allow videos? 20:01:40 <hottuna> 5) I2PCon: Arrange schedule of event 20:01:43 <hottuna> 6) dogecoindark.i2p home page request 20:01:54 <chlorelium> aloha! Nice to be here with you all today. 20:02:02 <z3r0fox@oftc> o/ 20:02:07 <EinMByte> Hi 20:02:13 <hottuna> ***** 0) ***** 20:02:19 <hottuna> Hello@all 20:02:36 <hottuna> Does anyone have any questions or anything that should be added to the agenda? 20:02:43 <RN> hi 20:03:00 <str4d> hi 20:03:00 <lazygravy> Hi 20:03:01 <EinMByte> Do we have a livestream? (for con) 20:03:15 * RN has input for #3 but will wait till it comes up 20:03:31 <lazygravy> EinMByte: sounds like talk for #4 20:03:38 <hottuna> EinMByte, no. nothing like that has been organized. let's add that discussion to 4) 20:03:46 <hottuna> anything else? 20:03:49 <EinMByte> ok 20:04:04 <chlorelium> one thing 20:04:06 <chlorelium> donations 20:04:15 <chlorelium> I was talking with dnj about donations at i2pcon 20:04:22 <chlorelium> not sure how we're handling that 20:04:25 <chlorelium> we should hash that out today. 20:04:40 <hottuna> let's add that as 7) 20:05:08 <hottuna> ok. 20:05:13 <hottuna> **** 1) **** 20:05:19 <hottuna> 1) I2PCon: Status update 20:05:37 <hottuna> So.. the current status is that we're finalizing most aspects of the event. 20:06:00 <hottuna> We have all of our speakers verified. 20:06:16 <hottuna> The next step is constructing a schedule 20:06:27 <hottuna> And lastly making a 2nd announcement 20:06:48 <EinMByte> How many participants do we have right now? Do we know that? 20:06:52 <hottuna> Containing more details, like schedule and whatever else might be useful. 20:07:06 <EinMByte> Do we have a webpage? Do we need one? 20:07:07 <hottuna> EinMByte, that is a good question. And something chlorelium has brought up. 20:07:19 <hottuna> Hacklab can seat 40people 20:07:21 <EinMByte> Like a page on geti2pNet 20:07:32 <EinMByte> s/geti2pNet/geti2p.net 20:07:42 <hottuna> EinMByte, I've voted against making a website due to the amount of work that would entail. 20:07:44 <chlorelium> hottuna: actually got a revised number, it 48 chairs, though it's a squeze 20:08:28 <hottuna> So speaking of the number of attendees, chlorelium requested that we try to keep track of the number somehow,. 20:08:39 <EinMByte> hottuna: well, an enitre website might be a little bit too much. But at least a page with the information? 20:08:44 <hottuna> The current idea is an evenbrite page where people can sign up. 20:09:11 <chlorelium> EinMByte: I was thinking an Eventbrite page. Mostly I don't want a situation where we seat 48 people and 200 show up :) 20:09:30 <chlorelium> Hacklab has an eventbrite account, I can set something up shortly. 20:09:39 <lazygravy> hottuna: whatever is used, it should be made sure it doesn't block tor connections. I am sure most people would like to sign up over it. 20:10:03 <hottuna> Could we squeeze more than 48 people in there if some are left to stand? 20:10:03 <EinMByte> chlorelium: well, you can always give people a token that they need to show on entrance 20:10:11 <hottuna> Just to give us some margins 20:10:16 <dg> \o. 20:10:31 <hottuna> EinMByte, we have the announcment, and we're going to make another annoucnement in the smae style as the first 20:10:37 <chlorelium> hottuna: yes, it's standing room for probably 80+ 20:10:53 <chlorelium> lazygravy: noted re: TOR 20:10:56 <hottuna> other than that I don't have any volunteers for building a webpage. 20:11:44 <chlorelium> EinMByte: eventbrite generates "tickets"; doesn't need real name or real phone # though, it can be anonymous signup through tor with throwaway email 20:11:50 <chlorelium> EinMByte: so that can be the token of sorts 20:12:02 <hottuna> it sounds pretty good. 20:12:16 <EinMByte> That's good. Eventbrite seems good. But we should probably link to it on the I2P website 20:12:29 <EinMByte> (can be in a blog entry I suppose) 20:12:43 <hottuna> EinMByte, we will on the second announcement and probably from the first one too. 20:12:54 <EinMByte> ok 20:12:58 <hottuna> it's only there to give us an estimate of the number of participants 20:12:59 <RN> mmm... I suppose an I2P internal mirror of event brite would be a bit much... 20:13:21 <dg> RN: unlikely though somebody (I?) could ask. depends on how big they are, and if we have any contacts 20:13:35 <hottuna> :P 20:13:38 <hottuna> that's being pretty optimistic 20:13:56 <hottuna> we're also working on a flyer for the event 20:13:56 <RN> yeah, put that in the notes for "next time" 20:14:09 <EinMByte> So cholerlium, you set up the eventbrite page? 20:14:18 <hottuna> i was hoping to have an early version of it ready now, but will likely get to see it later tonight 20:14:19 <chlorelium> EinMByte: sure, I'll do that doay 20:14:21 <chlorelium> *today 20:14:43 <hottuna> splendid, the sooner we have a link, the sonner we can startp ublishing it 20:14:45 <chlorelium> EinMByte: I can at least generate the URL for posting, and we can populate it with content later if need be 20:15:27 <hottuna> Ok, anything else anyone would like to add? 20:15:36 <RN> sooner url is generated, sooner if it is tor-friendly can be tested 20:15:38 <EinMByte> *chlorelium 20:16:11 <z3r0fox@oftc> Regarding info in the second announcement, ppl may want to know if they'll be able to plug in 20:16:53 <hottuna> z3r0fox: nice catch 20:17:00 <chlorelium> z3r0fox: plug in to power, network, or what? 20:17:01 <lazygravy> Plug in being Internet access? 20:17:14 <chlorelium> power we have :) 20:17:18 <z3r0fox@oftc> Both... 20:17:28 <str4d> I've used Eventbrite via Tor before, it worked fine for me 20:17:30 <str4d> (back in 2013 registering for RWC 2014) 20:17:42 <RN> thx str4d 20:18:08 <chlorelium> so 20:18:12 <chlorelium> power: 20:18:17 <chlorelium> we have many large power strips 20:18:26 <RN> network? wifi? 20:18:31 <chlorelium> some of them hang from the ceiling, we could potentially run them under/behing rows of seats 20:18:37 <chlorelium> network is mostly through wifi 20:18:51 <hottuna> str4d, thanks 20:18:51 <chlorelium> we regularly handle 30+ people on the guest network 20:18:57 <chlorelium> we also have piratebox, if anyone cares :) 20:19:21 <chlorelium> I'll ask our ops person how many connections the guest network can accomodate before going to shit 20:19:27 <hottuna> ok. so we'll ahve some power at the very least and wifi for ~everyone 20:19:58 <chlorelium> yup 20:20:13 <chlorelium> this is also a helpful item in getting headcount before-hand 20:20:22 <EinMByte> good 20:20:22 <chlorelium> we can plan ahead for wireless needs 20:20:27 <hottuna> alright. anything else for 1)? 20:20:30 <dg> Somebody a few days ago by the name of 'saltire' messaged me, inquiring about setting up a relay between OFTC and IRC2P for #torontocrypto. He hasn't messaged me since, and #torontocrypto has no relay (just ChanServ and I). Would saltire, or somebody else from the TC side, be able to set one up? 20:20:48 <dg> I could probably do it because OFTC allows Tor, but I'd prefer a TC person. 20:21:13 <hottuna> dg, possibly. I know saltire from meatspace. 20:21:24 <hottuna> dg, could we save that until after the meeting? 20:21:28 <RN> mmm.... lag? or is network not available...? 20:21:31 <dg> hottuna: np 20:21:40 <hottuna> ok 20:21:45 <hottuna> **** 2) **** 20:21:48 <hottuna> 2) I2PCon: Liquor license ($25) 20:21:53 <hottuna> We're getting one. 20:21:54 <hottuna> Today. 20:22:03 <hottuna> No worries, we've got this. 20:22:06 <chlorelium> paperwork for that is almost filled out, just have to file 20:22:14 <lazygravy> :-) 20:22:21 <chlorelium> already called the LCBO, they'll have someone there until 9pm EDT to accept our app 20:22:25 <chlorelium> and actually the deadline is tomorrow night 20:22:30 <zzz> is license for consumption, sales, or both? 20:22:37 <lazygravy> BYOB? 20:22:38 <hottuna> So with the license there are some obligations we have to fulfill. Like not getting people shitfaced. 20:22:49 <hottuna> zzz, consumption. 20:22:54 <hottuna> lazygravy, no. 20:23:00 <chlorelium> license does not allow for sale. It's for consumption only. if we want a sale license the cost jumps to $75 20:23:11 <hottuna> having a license is not compatible with BYOB 20:23:17 <EinMByte> So that means drinks are free? 20:23:18 <chlorelium> BYOB is a no-no. BYO is illegal at public events like this 20:23:30 <hottuna> EinMByte, yes. but only a small amount. 20:23:32 * RN pouts about non-attendance "awww man... they'll even have beer!!!" :( 20:23:45 <hottuna> We're talking about 1-2 beers / participant depending on how many show up 20:23:46 <chlorelium> (and normally we wouldn't care, but guaranteed gov't types will show up and someone somewhere will complain about a lack of license) 20:23:59 <hottuna> And how generous eche|on is feeling 20:24:06 <zzz> fine. we have a bucket for donations (topic #7) 20:24:18 <chlorelium> We can have more alcohol for sale, but it means pitching in $50 extra for that license 20:24:24 <chlorelium> application process is essentially the same, though 20:24:25 <EinMByte> hottuna: ok. Do you have some systems for keeping track of who has already had their drink? Or do you think this won't be a problem? 20:24:41 <hottuna> zzz, as long as the donation bucket isn't explicitly for booze we should b efine 20:24:58 <hottuna> EinMByte, not really. but we don't plan on bringing tons. 20:25:02 <chlorelium> just FYI: if we take donations at the door and hand out drink tickets, we need a "sale" license since that's viewed as an indirect sale 20:25:26 <chlorelium> that doesn't mean we're prohibited from taking donations and giving drink tickets, but we can't do it in that order with a "no sale" license o_0 20:25:29 <chlorelium> liquor laws are silly 20:25:59 <EinMByte> hottuna: let's just assume honesty then 20:25:59 <chlorelium> EinMByte: I think honesty is a good policy :) 20:25:59 <hottuna> EinMByte, that's the idea. 20:25:59 <hottuna> Anything else on 2)? 20:26:14 <chlorelium> just a note 20:26:21 <chlorelium> once we get the license (in a week) 20:26:32 <chlorelium> we'll have to go to the LCBO with the license to do the purchasing 20:26:45 <chlorelium> whomever is bringing alcohol can't just pick up a bunch and then bring it 20:26:58 <chlorelium> there's something about the LCBO keeping track of sales 20:27:15 <hottuna> ok. that shouldn't be too much of a problem. 20:27:21 <chlorelium> I think they want to make sure you're not buying $1K of beer for a single event :) 20:27:30 <chlorelium> the license will probably get mailed to the lab 20:27:35 <chlorelium> I can get in touch when it does. 20:27:44 <hottuna> splendid 20:28:07 <hottuna> **** 3) **** 20:28:08 <hottuna> 3) I2PCon: Allow photos without explicit consent? 20:28:13 <chlorelium> so 20:28:23 <hottuna> Does anyone have a strong opinion? 20:28:31 <chlorelium> Hacklab default policy has almost always been "not without explicit consent" 20:28:47 <chlorelium> we can suspend that, however there's a good chance there will be members in the space who are not there for the con who might not want their pictures taken 20:29:04 <hottuna> alright, I guess that makes this choice a whole lot easier for us. 20:29:19 <chlorelium> We could have colour-coded nametags or something to communicate consent, if people like that idea. 20:29:31 <hottuna> Does anyone have any problems with not allowing photos to be taken? 20:29:41 <hottuna> (without explicit consent) 20:30:26 <hottuna> Does anyone want to add anything to 3)? 20:30:46 <dg> 3) being photo consent? 20:30:49 <str4d> I think explicit consent is fine 20:30:52 <hottuna> yes 20:30:53 <z3r0fox@oftc> It'll have to be made clear at the door, because phones 20:31:07 <lazygravy> str4d: that method seemed to work good at HOPE. 20:31:10 <EinMByte> I agree, some people will not want their picture taken 20:31:20 <dg> As long as explicit consent is fine and there's an understanding that people will remove pictures if asked 20:31:23 <chlorelium> z3r0fox: sure, we'll make a sign 20:31:27 <RN> yes 20:31:33 <RN> I missed all of three 20:31:44 <hottuna> excellent 20:31:56 <str4d> The nametag idea is a nice one. Maybe the Eventbrite page could have a tickbox for consent (yes/no/undecided) 20:32:14 * psi scrolls 20:32:26 <chlorelium> str4d: that's been done for non-hacklab events before 20:32:37 <EinMByte> str4d: good idea 20:32:39 <chlorelium> it doesn't even have to be a nametag, so much as a coloured piece of paper 20:32:46 <str4d> Nametag with green == fine. Without == must ask. 20:32:50 <str4d> chlorelium: nice 20:32:53 <RN> I have something to add to three and will just spam-paste it about 9 lines... 20:33:07 <hottuna> str4d, chlorelium: i'm not sure I would like to organize all of that I'd rather keep it barebones and like a simple rule 20:33:10 <RN> make an itoopie mask that people who don't want to be photographed can hold up in front of their face when picture is taken.... 20:33:10 <RN> easier than trusting someone else to photoshop the itoopie mask in later 20:33:10 <RN> mascott exposure == good pr | fun | inexpensive 20:33:10 <RN> requrired materials (assembly requrired) 20:33:10 <RN> paper plates 20:33:11 <RN> yellow spray paint 20:33:15 <RN> large tounge depressors 20:33:17 <RN> staples (that go through wood) or glue/tape 20:33:19 <RN> black marker or black paint & brush 20:33:39 <hottuna> RN: If anyone wants make a mask, that would be perfect! 20:33:46 <chlorelium> :D 20:33:49 <RN> give them out at the door... it starts the conversation about photos 20:33:55 <psi> are masks allowed still? 20:33:59 <hottuna> i'm putting it in the sure, why not bin. 20:34:02 <psi> like, anti protest laws etc 20:34:12 <dg> I imagine it's ok in a private space 20:34:17 <hottuna> we're not protesting. I think. and also indoors. 20:34:26 <psi> okay 20:34:27 <hottuna> anyway, can we move on? 20:34:35 <hottuna> **** 4) **** 20:34:35 <str4d> And it's not a mask as much as a masque 20:34:48 <hottuna> 4) I2PCon: Allow videos? 20:34:48 <hottuna> Video livestream? 20:34:58 <chlorelium> psi: the mask laws don't apply 20:35:01 <dg> Yes yes yes yes yes if somebody is willing to do it. 20:35:07 <chlorelium> ianal, but I'm pretty sure of that one :P 20:35:13 <str4d> Videos / livestream partly ties in to #3 20:35:18 <lazygravy> Will the speakers be okay with this? 20:35:25 <dg> Make it clear that it's being recorded and indicate where people can sit if they want to be free from cameras 20:35:26 <hottuna> I don't think we have anyone willing to do all of the video work. 20:35:31 <hottuna> Nor do we have the equipment. 20:35:34 <z3r0fox@oftc> Since the expert videographer couldn't make it, I could set a couple HD cams up to point at the presenters to save the presentations for later. But there were some reervations. 20:35:37 <EinMByte> I think we definitely need a lifestream, as I suggested earlier 20:35:37 <dg> zzz mentioned something for Twitter 20:35:46 <EinMByte> *live 20:35:48 <RN> I'm not talking about wearing a mask... but I think we've moved on... 20:35:52 <str4d> dg: Periscope 20:35:57 <dg> str4d: That's it 20:35:59 <zzz> I propose to just periscope the talks from the @i2p account from my phone. I have a baby tripod and phone mount 20:36:25 <zzz> a real tripod would be better if anybody can bring one 20:36:29 <str4d> Does Periscope allow video to be saved, or purely an ephemeral livestream? 20:36:41 <RN> is periscope persistant? 20:36:44 <zzz> dunno 20:36:50 <hottuna> z3r0fox: if I could leave the responsibility of making video happen on your shoulders (including the work afterwards) 20:36:56 <dg> I might be able to just dump the stream anyway 20:36:59 <hottuna> i would be pretty happy about it 20:37:15 <z3r0fox@oftc> zzz: Is that something that could be good enough to edit for Youtube? I have 1 tripod, two HD cams, can get another tripod for 2 camera shoot if needed then I'd volunteer to editand put on Youtube or distibute provately, whatever 20:37:26 <hottuna> if not and no one else is stepping up, we're not going to have video. 20:37:50 <psi> if we do video we should also have an eventual i2p torrent 20:38:11 <hottuna> z3r0fox: so that means you'd go the full length and organize all of it? 20:38:14 <zzz> i've just played with periscope for a couple minutes. Not an expert. 20:38:16 * RN agrees with psi 20:38:29 <z3r0fox@oftc> hottuna: Yeah, it's not a big deal, simple edits. I just wouldn't want to lose document of presentations, assuming presenters are okay with being filmed. 20:38:34 <zzz> If we have nobody to do anything better, periscope is our fallback 20:38:38 <hottuna> psi, I agree about distributing it through bittorrent. 20:38:39 <dg> Woo! livestreamer (a Python tool) supports Periscope (http://docs.livestreamer.io/plugin_matrix.html). I and others could easily dump the stream to disk with it. 20:38:41 <iRelay> Title: Plugins Livestreamer 1.12.2 documentation (at docs.livestreamer.io) 20:39:09 <RN> nice find dg 20:39:13 <z3r0fox@oftc> hottuna: Yeah, not much equipment to set up. I'll talkk with chlorelium about sightlines and warning people about being filmed offline 20:39:13 <hottuna> dg, livestreaming is a bit more work to make actually work. 20:39:28 <str4d> Okay, so we have zzz's phone and two HD cams from z3r0fox. More than enough to get video 20:39:34 <hottuna> z3r0fox 20:39:35 <hottuna> sounds good 20:39:37 <dg> hottuna: Yes, but if we have to use periscope via zzzphone, persistence isn't an issue. 20:39:42 <RN> although a secondary recording kept on the periscoping device would be ideal in case of stream outages.... 20:39:46 <str4d> Pertinent issues: 20:40:01 <str4d> a) Each speaker would need to give consent/no 20:40:15 <hottuna> re live streaming: Does anyone want to assume the responsibility of making that happen? 20:40:44 <str4d> b) Cameras need to be set up such that they either only film the speakers, or provide plenty of blindspots for attendees who don't want to be filmed. 20:40:46 <hottuna> str4d, a) I think we could handle that at the event (if we don't have any complaints earlier) 20:40:49 * RN passes note to hottuna and chlorelium "make sure to give zzz's device highest QOS and firewall clearance... " ;) 20:40:57 <chlorelium> str4d: that's doable 20:41:04 <chlorelium> lol 20:41:09 <str4d> c) We would also want to record the presentation itself, via a screen recorder 20:41:10 <zzz> I'll do periscope. with my fancy $1 tripod and $4 mount 20:41:11 <chlorelium> I'll talk to ops :) 20:41:16 <dg> zzz: showoff 20:41:26 <str4d> (so it can be spliced into the final edit) 20:41:34 <z3r0fox@oftc> str4d: Good point about the slide decks, hmm 20:41:55 <hottuna> I guess a screen recorder could be set up. 20:42:14 <dg> decks is going to be easy, we can just ask them all to provide at the end 20:42:17 <str4d> It *could* be handled post- if we had the slides themselves, but probably easier to just edit a third video stream in rather than inserting slides 20:42:19 <z3r0fox@oftc> str4d: I could just use the slides probably unless the presentation's animated 20:42:25 <hottuna> z3r0fox: could the video be made without a screen recorder (but with the presentations crammed in there somehow)? 20:42:34 <hottuna> z3r0fox: perfect 20:42:55 <hottuna> So far I haven't had any takers on organizing live-streaming 20:42:56 <z3r0fox@oftc> hottuna: yeah I would just pull them in as images on another video 'channel' in kdenlive 20:43:06 <dg> At CCC, the recorders tend to just alternate between the speaker and the presentation as for when it is pertinent. 20:43:11 <zzz> if you all want to get your questions answered about periscope, install it on your phone and play around with it. follow the @i2p acct and i'll do a test later in the week 20:43:13 <EinMByte> slides should probably be uploaded somewhere 20:43:15 <str4d> yeah, could just display static slide from PDF/PowerPoint/whatever while playing audio from another video stream 20:43:20 <hottuna> So unless that changes, we won't have it. Which isn't a problem. 20:43:24 <dg> They show the slide for long enough for you to read, show the speaker when they get excited/haven't changed slide in a while, then go back to the slide, etc 20:43:32 <dg> hottuna: zzz is doing periscope 20:43:45 <hottuna> zzz, are you doing periscope? 20:43:49 <zzz> your phone will bleep at you when I go live ;) 20:43:50 <dg> yes 20:43:56 <dg> <&zzz> I'll do periscope. with my fancy $1 tripod and $4 mount 20:44:04 <zzz> yes 20:45:06 <zzz> if zerofox has a tripod for me that would be even better. would keep it from being knocked over, but not req'd 20:46:23 <z3r0fox@oftc> zzz: Just have one at the moment, I was going to look into getting a second one used for cam 2 (second shot angle)... but I may have oneof those small tabletop ones somewhere as well 20:47:00 <zzz> ok. bring duct tape ;) 20:47:11 <hottuna> ok. thats confirmation enough 20:47:13 <hottuna> i'm leaving it in your hands 20:47:13 <hottuna> alright, anything else regarding 4)? 20:47:13 <hottuna> *** 5) **** 20:47:13 <hottuna> 5) I2PCon: Arrange schedule of event 20:47:13 <hottuna> I can't say I ahve a lot to say about it yet, but the contents of day#1&&day#2 is as follows 20:47:14 <hottuna> 15 Aug 20:47:14 <hottuna> tentative time: 2PM - midnight Not necessarily in this order 20:47:15 <hottuna> Nick Johnston: "TOS and PII - What happens to your data when the company gets bought and sold?" Different terms of service from popular web apps 20:47:18 <hottuna> Keynote: Guest speaker 1 (1 hour) (before cryptoparty or after?) "Privacy vs. Intelligence - Why can't we all just get along?" 20:47:21 <hottuna> Dinner break - where/when? 20:47:21 <hottuna> Short I2P General presentation, by zzz: "Growing the Network, Spreading the Word" 20:47:23 <hottuna> Cryptoparty presentation, by ?? (j?) 20:47:23 <hottuna> Cryptoparty, by j (how long?) 20:47:25 <hottuna> 16 Aug 20:47:25 <hottuna> tentative time: 12AM - 8 PM Not necessarily in this order 20:47:26 <hottuna> Confirmed guest speaker 2 (1 hour) "I2P Monitoring and Filtration" (requested time: early) 20:47:29 <hottuna> Confirmed guest speaker 1 (1 hour) "Anonymity protocols and malware - Why they fail" 20:47:31 <hottuna> I2P Technical presentation, by zzz: "The Connection Limit Challenge" 20:47:33 <hottuna> I2P Technical discussion, led by (zzz??) Topics TBD 20:47:34 <hottuna> I2P App Dev Intro, by psi 20:47:35 <hottuna> The Agony and the Ecstasy of I2P on Android, by str4d (via skype) 20:47:36 <hottuna> i2pd presentation by orignal Title: "i2pd"; requested time: 15 minutes 20:47:38 <hottuna> Roadmap meeting. led by zzz: When is 1.0? Crypto migration schedule (RI, snark) (EC vs. Ed), LS2, NTCP2, new DH, Java 7, SAM 3.2, Jetty 9, 12-month plan 20:47:41 <hottuna> Organizational meeting, led by zzz: Finances, roles, PR, servers and services, CCC planning 20:47:43 <hottuna> Dinner break - where/when? Order sandwich/pizza delivery? Guest speakers probably need to be before the break, as they may be flying out. 20:47:44 <hottuna> 20:47:45 <hottuna> forgive the slightly chaotic nature of it at the moment 20:47:46 <hottuna> sorting it out and fixing it is what's going to happen next 20:47:51 <hottuna> there's not much to add to 5), but now you all know what I know. 20:47:51 <hottuna> does anyone have anything else to add to 5)? 20:48:13 <hottuna> everyone is aware of what they're going to do/speak about? 20:48:34 <dg> is orignal OK now? 20:48:36 <psi> i still need to flesh out my talk all the way 20:48:37 <EinMByte> seems good, should be online somewhere though 20:48:46 <hottuna> dg, he was always ok for a short talk? 20:48:49 <dg> EinMByte: it is 20:48:57 <psi> i was thinking workshop but it seems like it's a talk 20:49:01 <dg> hottuna: he was reluctant to speak at all, and wasn't sure what to say 20:49:13 <dg> I think he might need a bit of prompting for subjects 20:49:19 <psi> probably easier to do a talk 20:49:20 <EinMByte> dg: link? 20:49:34 <hottuna> psi, would a short talk be ok? we could move it to the crypto party part of this? 20:49:59 <hottuna> dg, ok. I'm going to have to confirm orignal a second time. 20:50:07 <hottuna> i will do it OOB from this meeting 20:50:19 <dg> EinMByte: http://trac.i2p2.i2p/wiki/MeetupToronto2015 20:50:20 <psi> cryptoparty time makesss sense 20:50:28 <dg> i2p2.de if you're in the clearnet, but why are you? ;) 20:50:34 <EinMByte> dg: thanks 20:51:19 <hottuna> ok. next topic? 20:51:30 <chlorelium> question: how much of this is i2pcon and how much is cryptoparty 20:51:38 <psi> for my workshop i was going to have people write the example echo client serve 20:51:41 <hottuna> ehm. good question. 20:51:52 <chlorelium> like, are we running a cryptoparty as a separate event, or are we just having the TC folks give presentations, or what? 20:51:54 <hottuna> we don't have enough crypto party stations at this point 20:52:02 <hottuna> so it's going to be heavily I2PCon 20:52:13 <hottuna> and a crypto party to the etent we can find crypto party volunteers 20:52:31 <dg> if anyone is willing to help others setup popular crypto tools like OTR, obviously I2P, Tor, etc., then that'd be appreciated 20:52:36 <chlorelium> so this sounds like i2pcon with some involvement from TC, rather than one event nested inside another 20:52:41 <dg> Tails and that sort of thing. 20:52:59 <hottuna> chlorelium, the crypto party bit of day#1 will probably be scheduled for the lunch break and onkly be like an hour or two 20:53:51 <chlorelium> hmm 20:53:52 <chlorelium> okay 20:54:09 <chlorelium> so hottuna mentioned irl just now that more volunteers are needed for the cryptoparty aspect 20:54:22 <chlorelium> TC is the best for that, I'm not able to help so much in that area 20:55:06 <chlorelium> not sure how everyone wants to run that. 20:55:42 <EinMByte> Can we go to 6)? I have some comments and must leave soon 20:55:47 <chlorelium> you could run the cryptoparty as sort of a socialization session 20:55:51 <chlorelium> sure 20:55:56 <hottuna> EinMByte, sure 20:56:03 <hottuna> **** 6) **** 20:56:08 <hottuna> 6) dogecoindark.i2p home page request 20:56:17 <EinMByte> The website uses a lot of "external" stuff 20:56:36 <EinMByte> That is, it uses resources from various non-i2p websites 20:56:48 <dg> The owner didn't really get the problem with that, but after speaking with him, he agreed that it's problematic in some cases. He felt it was ok to keep Facebook/Twitter share buttons. 20:57:01 <hottuna> zzz, EinMByte 20:57:05 <zzz> this is my agenda item, hottuna may i have the floor? 20:57:25 <hottuna> zzz, please 20:57:28 <EinMByte> Also, we already have anoncoin.i2p. Do we really need more cryptocurrency links? 20:57:43 <zzz> thank you hottuna 20:57:53 <zzz> the request is here http://zzz.i2p/topics/236?page=2#p9999 20:58:03 <iRelay> Title: zzz.i2p: How to get my Eepsite added to the Router Console home page (at zzz.i2p) 20:58:06 <zzz> in the form of answers to the questions in the first post of that thread 20:58:16 <zzz> is the operator of the site here? 20:58:29 <dg> no, i've pinged him in another chan, he's been idle for 5m so give him a moment 20:59:50 <EinMByte> Note also that the website needs javascript to load, which may be a problem for some people (like me) 21:00:11 <zzz> ok, while we wait, does anybody have any comments pro or con? 21:00:48 <hottuna> i don't really know what the website is 21:01:08 <dg> It's a cryptocoin which supports I2P 21:01:24 <hottuna> is it straight up dogecoin? 21:01:34 <zzz> re: 1MB's comments, we don't have external resource links or js use as criteria for rejection at the moment 21:01:37 <dg> no, it's dogecoin forked to have I2P support 21:02:05 <EinMByte> The main problem (appart from technical stuff which can be fixed of course) I see is that we already have anoncoin on the homepage 21:02:09 <zzz> let's go back to the basics. is this of general interest to the i2p community? 21:02:11 <EinMByte> which is a very similar project 21:02:29 <EinMByte> So I'm not sure if we need another cryptocurrency on the homepage 21:02:52 <dg> "We need more of everything" -- I don't know if it's a bad thing to have more than one. Got to account for the bus, and the bus almost hit Meeh.. he was gone for a while and Anoncoin is only recovering now. 21:03:06 <zzz> we don't ever want just one of anything, and ANC is on life support anyway 21:03:26 <EinMByte> I agree that "we need more of everything". But I don't think that applies to the homepage 21:04:09 <zzz> does anybody here use dogecoindark? 21:04:41 <zzz> anybody have any other comments? 21:04:43 <dg> abyss does, but he's not in here (and doesn't appear to be around at the moment). He runs a market. 21:04:52 <dg> I'm on the fence. I don't really mind. 21:05:42 <zzz> anybody strongly in favor or strongly against? 21:05:52 <EinMByte> Well, if there is interest from other people I'm ok with it BUT only if the external resource issue is resolved 21:05:58 <hottuna> im mildy in favor 21:06:08 <EinMByte> (until then, strongly against, after that neutral) 21:06:27 <psi> can i be strongly indifferent? :D 21:06:34 <hottuna> doesn't hurt. I quess the fact that is depends on lots of external stuff is kind of bad. And there should be some kind of warning perhaps 21:06:38 <EinMByte> That said, there should be a ruled wrt to external resources because it's a pretty serious problem 21:07:12 <zzz> so you think home page eepsites should not load clearnet css/images? should that be a criterion? 21:07:32 <hottuna> possibly? 21:07:45 <EinMByte> zzz: I think no eepsite should do that yes. Especially not the ones on the home page 21:08:13 <dg> it shouldn't be a blanket. if they have a good excuse we might allow it, not that I can think of any 21:08:13 <EinMByte> In this case, it's probably not intentionally malicious 21:08:22 <EinMByte> But it could be 21:09:25 <RN> I agree that outernet resources should be strongly discouraged 21:09:25 <zzz> it's not a good user experience though 21:09:25 <zzz> ok let's table this topic without a final decision for now 21:09:25 <zzz> back to you hottuna thank you 21:09:25 <hottuna> ok :) 21:09:39 <hottuna> **** 7) **** 21:09:41 <hottuna> 7) I2PCon: donations 21:09:51 <EinMByte> Didn't zzz already comment on this? 21:09:57 <EinMByte> Anyway, bye. 21:10:05 <hottuna> EinMByte, cya 21:10:42 <chlorelium> So originally we were told that all donations collected during the con would be given to the hacklab 21:10:54 <chlorelium> this came from dnj, through f3ndot 21:11:02 <chlorelium> dnj and I discussed this the other day as well 21:11:19 <chlorelium> It's not actually a big deal though; if i2p wants some/all of the donations, we can arrange for that 21:11:21 <zzz> I don't recall anybody promising that 21:11:26 <dg> nor do I 21:12:29 <chlorelium> I'm just going to have to tell the hacklab membership. I doubt they'll be particularly upset 21:12:29 <zzz> hottuna, did you make that promise? 21:12:29 <chlorelium> hmm, interesting. so there's a bit of broken communication somewhere. 21:12:29 <dg> I think it's reasonable to give a contribution for the services but I don't remember a commitment 21:12:29 <hottuna> no. It must've come up between dnj and f3ndot 21:12:29 <hottuna> I havent really touched the topic of donations before 21:12:39 <hottuna> So, what are our requirements for donations? 21:12:42 <hottuna> Do we have ny? 21:12:43 <hottuna> *any 21:12:43 <hottuna> Do we care? 21:12:55 <hottuna> Could we have separate donation boxes? 21:12:59 <zzz> i propose we have a single bucket and we split it 3 ways i2p/TC/hacklab after covering booze costs 21:13:13 <hottuna> Or one with which we split? 21:13:23 <dg> boxes sounds good but risks saturation of any funds.. a bucket would be good 21:13:25 <hottuna> zzz, that sounds good to me. 21:13:37 <hottuna> :p 21:13:37 <chlorelium> zzz: if we have the donation bucket cover booze before it's split, we need a $75 event permit 21:13:38 <dg> i'm sure the topic of I2P finance/project scale will come up in the talks which means people may be willing to donate something anyway 21:13:41 <zzz> we are paying for the hacklab services already 21:13:54 <hottuna> does anyone mind the idea of splitting the contents of the donation box? 21:13:57 <chlorelium> ontario law is that the hosting org needs to absorb all alcohol costs 21:14:10 <zzz> who is the hosting org? 21:14:12 <dg> if people really want to give to us, they can do that 21:14:19 <dg> zzz: oh. then between i2p/tc depending on how much tc helps with 21:14:41 <zzz> whose name on the permit? 21:14:44 <chlorelium> zzz: hacklab is on the application 21:14:47 <hottuna> so the donations aren't tied to booze. and let's not say that they are. it would just be a problem for everyone involved. 21:15:51 <zzz> yeah but you realize we can't give you 1/3 of gross 21:17:07 <hottuna> zzz, are you saying that we don't want to hand 1/3rd over to hacklab? 21:17:07 <zzz> so hacklab, not i2p, is buying all the beer? 21:17:07 <zzz> who is buying the beer? 21:17:07 <hottuna> technically yes, practically no. 21:17:08 <chlorelium> ^ this 21:17:18 <hottuna> eche|on, or someone will walk to the booze-store with the permit and buy what we need. 21:17:26 <zzz> ok then lets not get all techical/practical about donations 21:17:46 <str4d> Okay, so hacklab is being paid for venue hire, and will increase their invoice to cover their beer costs, no? 21:17:59 <hottuna> str4d, no. 21:18:09 <hottuna> we're paying for beer. 21:18:11 <str4d> Then I'm confused 21:18:20 <hottuna> it will come out of eche|ons pocket 21:18:27 <str4d> hottuna: I was speaking technically 21:18:34 <hottuna> hacklab isn't monetarily involved in it 21:18:43 <chlorelium> str4d: that's understandable, the permitting process is ridiculous. incidentally, I apologize in advance for how complicated all of this is. 21:18:44 <str4d> (since they are required by law to cover it, no?) 21:19:09 <hottuna> ah. technically they're buying booze, practically we (echelon) are 21:19:17 <str4d> I just want to make sure that asses are covered 21:19:21 <str4d> K 21:19:26 <chlorelium> pretty much. you can take the permit to the LCBO, or we can do it 21:19:30 <chlorelium> as long as the costs are covered. 21:19:52 <hottuna> i think we have this sorted out well enough. 21:19:55 <str4d> So on any invoice, it would appear as "venue: $X. booze: $Y. Already paid: $Y. Due: $X." 21:19:59 <str4d> K 21:20:03 <chlorelium> you're renting the lab space, essentially, which in this case makes you a representative of the venue. or that's what I'm going to say if anyone asks. 21:20:24 <chlorelium> str4d: sure. we generally don't invoice people, but that can be arranged no problem. 21:20:29 <zzz> so i'm back to my original proposal, we have a single donation bucket, and that above and beyond certain (cough) expenses, we graciously split the rest, if any, 3 ways with TC and hacklab 21:21:16 <str4d> chlorelium: not sure if invoices are required by law, is the thing. You could say better than me :) 21:21:31 <hottuna> zzz, do we really want to go about it that way. 21:21:33 <zzz> assuming TC wants any $$ 21:21:38 <hottuna> i'd rather do it properly. 21:21:44 <dg> what is properly? 21:22:02 <zzz> ^^ what is properly, indeed? 21:22:02 <chlorelium> zzz: incidentally, how much did you discuss renting the lab space for back in april (or whenever this was worked out)? 21:22:05 <zzz> let's hear your proposal 21:22:15 <hottuna> properly as not have any boze money taken out of the donation box. 21:22:21 <zzz> chlorelium, tuna did the negotiations 21:22:22 <hottuna> my proposal is we split it 3 ways 21:23:01 <zzz> if you don't want to take booze money taken out of donations, then let's spend $50 more and sell the beer 21:23:17 <hottuna> does anyone want to stand there and sell beer? 21:23:42 <zzz> otherwise i2p is giving several dollars to TC and hacklab for every beer that we give away! 21:23:43 <str4d> If we spend $50 more, then we *can* take booze money out of donations 21:24:02 <str4d> (IIUC) 21:24:16 <zzz> or else have three buckets 21:24:23 <hottuna> str4d, I guess that is correct. but do you really know that we'll get 50$ in donations? 21:24:39 <hottuna> i think we're overthinking this. 21:25:05 <hottuna> the donations are _not_ going to be anywhere near the expenses we've had putting this event on 21:25:33 <zzz> giving 2/3 of our donations away starting at first dollar, when we're paying for the beer is a terrible idea 21:25:34 <hottuna> we're talking about $50-$100 worth of beer. 21:25:38 <hottuna> that's not a lot. 21:25:43 <chlorelium> hey 21:25:45 <chlorelium> so 21:25:47 <chlorelium> let me check the regulations 21:25:54 <chlorelium> I think I need to re-read some wording 21:26:05 <chlorelium> essentially, we can't tell people to donate to cover beer cost 21:26:18 <chlorelium> if people donate and we take money out of the pot to cover that, it might be fine 21:26:26 <chlorelium> the wording is ambiguous in the doc I read 21:26:31 <chlorelium> as for splitting the pot 21:26:52 <hottuna> chlorelium, if that is legal, let's do that. 21:27:04 <chlorelium> do it whichever way you would like. I'm not hung up on it. $150/day was pledged by i2p/tc for use of the space, and I'm happy for that 21:28:17 <str4d> There's also the fact to consider that hacklab is being paid for services rendered, vs. TC and I2P effectively volunteering. 21:29:30 <chlorelium> str4d: absolutely 21:29:40 <chlorelium> okay, here's the wording from the agco permit. 21:29:44 <chlorelium> Will alcohol be sold? 21:29:44 <chlorelium> You must answer yes to this question if you are 21:29:44 <chlorelium> collecting money for alcohol either directly, through 21:29:44 <chlorelium> the sale of alcohol or drink tickets at the event (e.g. 21:29:46 <chlorelium> cash bar, sale of drink tickets), or indirectly through 21:29:49 <chlorelium> the sale of admission, membership fees or the collection 21:29:51 <chlorelium> of money for alcohol before the event. 21:29:54 <chlorelium> so I think we're in the clear 21:30:08 <hottuna> So it's all basically fine. 21:30:19 <chlorelium> I called AGCO about this and they gave me a really wishy-washy answer. so all is well, I think. 21:30:32 <hottuna> (donations - beer_costs) / 3 21:30:40 <dg> I don't think hacklab should get any donation cut 21:30:51 <dg> They're being helpful but we are paying them for services 21:31:01 <hottuna> dg, they're not making a lot of money here. 21:31:22 <dg> Can we pay more for the beer licence, include that in what we pay them, and split donations between I2P and TC (depending on how much help TC gives)? 21:32:30 <hottuna> dg, if we do a donation box, it's ok to subtract money from the donated amount to cover beer costs according to the text above 21:32:39 <hottuna> so we dont need a fancier license 21:32:44 <dg> oh, cool 21:32:45 <str4d> So while I have no objections to hacklab receiving some of the donations, perhaps the split could be e.g. 1:2:2? 21:32:51 <dg> (I didn't get any text) 21:32:56 <hottuna> I would like to give them a part of the donations since A) they were promised it (by J it would seem) 21:33:05 <zzz> this is going to be a lot more than $50 worth of beer. I'm going to drink $50 worth myself. 21:33:20 <dg> that's what I thought ;). people at hacker cons like beer. a lot 21:33:44 * fox reminds you all not to cheap out on beer or buy anything american 21:34:07 <chlorelium> so hottuna's laptop just craped out 21:34:21 <dg> let's not honor other people's promises 21:34:27 <chlorelium> so I just talked to two other hacklab board members 21:34:33 <zzz> I don't give j's promises to hacklab any weight, no. 21:34:49 <chlorelium> we're cool with just $300 for the space usage, and covering the $25 alcohol license if that's cool 21:34:53 <hottuna> B) because they're part of the same community we are. 21:34:57 <chlorelium> you can keep the donations 21:35:12 <chlorelium> and sorry for all of the miscommuncation :( 21:35:18 <hottuna> i would still like to split it 3 ways. 21:35:29 <hottuna> does anyone else want to split it 3 ways? 21:35:35 <zzz> I'm ok with 1/1/1 split after (cough) costs 21:35:44 <zzz> and with covering their $25 21:35:50 <str4d> hottuna: I suggested maybe 1/2/2 split 21:35:50 <hottuna> zzz, that's what im proposing 21:36:07 <str4d> (unless people don't like hard math :P) 21:36:17 <hottuna> str4d, let's not do anything fancy here. 21:36:28 <hottuna> i would prefer an equal split 21:36:43 <hottuna> doing anything else just implies a bunch of stuff. 21:37:23 <hottuna> have a managed to convince everyone of a (donations-beer)/3 split? 21:37:28 <chlorelium> to be clear: I'm very happy to host y'all here, I just wanted to make sure everyone was on the same page. I don't want to cause any rancor. The love of money is the root of all evil :) 21:37:40 <dg> ok, but let's have an emphasis on I2P's size and need for more donations during talks. People can seek out our donation info if they want to 21:37:59 <hottuna> Sure, let's cram it in there somewhere. 21:38:25 <hottuna> str4d, dg, zzz: is that ok? 21:38:34 <str4d> So to summarize, we have hacklab saying "We don't need donations", hottuna saying "You *will* take donations", and everyone else not really minding either way? :P 21:38:53 <hottuna> yes. that sums it up. 21:38:54 <str4d> For the record, I don't mind a 1/1/1 split 21:38:59 <chlorelium> str4d: pretty much :P 21:39:00 <dg> hottuna: ok from me 21:39:00 <hottuna> want to do it my way? 21:39:23 <str4d> (after (cough) costs) 21:39:23 <hottuna> ok. 21:39:29 <hottuna> yes. 21:39:31 <hottuna> ok. 21:39:41 <hottuna> ok I tihnk we're done here. 21:39:46 <hottuna> anything else? 21:39:51 <dg> in general or i2pcon? 21:39:56 <hottuna> either 21:40:02 <str4d> psi: you still around? 21:40:06 <zzz> yes 21:40:19 <dg> ok, i2pconish: 21:40:20 <dg> <+dg> Somebody a few days ago by the name of 'saltire' messaged me, inquiring about setting up a relay between OFTC and IRC2P for #torontocrypto. He hasn't messaged me since, and #torontocrypto has no relay (just ChanServ and I). Would saltire, or somebody else from the TC side, be able to set one up? 21:40:22 <dg> <+dg> I could probably do it because OFTC allows Tor, but I'd prefer a TC person. 21:40:38 <dg> hottuna: Could you speak to saltire for a follow-up? 21:40:43 <psi> str4d: yes 21:41:17 <hottuna> dg.. sure 21:41:20 <hottuna> one se 21:41:22 <hottuna> c 21:41:38 <str4d> If saltire was asking if they could set it up, they only have to ask the network ops and the owner of the #torontocrypto channel on Irc2P 21:41:45 <zzz> reminder that relays to irc2p require irc op permission (although dg is one) 21:41:52 <hottuna> dg, I pinged him. 21:42:01 <hottuna> im leaving the rest of this up to the two of you. 21:42:18 <hottuna> saltire is typically available on #torontocrypto @ OFTC 21:42:20 <dg> thanks, and thx for the reminder, i would like to liaison with them if they could get back to me 21:42:43 <dg> If nobody's too exhausted from 3h of I2PCon and donation shoving... 21:42:48 <hottuna> :P 21:44:00 <hottuna> ok 21:44:00 <hottuna> this meeting is officially over 21:44:00 <hottuna> baf's the meeting hammer